FOLLOW US

FacebookYoutubeLinkedin

CALENDAR OF EVENTS

April 2019
S M T W T F S
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4

South Asia Peace Initiative

Maoists in Nepal Talk Peace

Kathmandu, Nepal - Nepalese leaders from three major political parties along with the president of the Human Rights Organization and a former Indian Ambassador to Nepal found common ground at a Kathmandu seminar as this Himalayan nation treks to the summit of a new, inclusive, democratic Nepal.

In strong, passionate speeches at the Sixth South Asia Peace Initiative (SAPI) program, Dec. 2, 2007, senior leaders of the Communist Party Nepal (Maoist), Nepali Congress, and Communist Party Nepal (UML) reaffirmed their parties' commitment to holding elections as soon as possible, creating a constitutional assembly, and making Nepal a republic. They were also appreciative of the support of Universal Peace Foundation in the ongoing peace process.


Mr. Alan Saunders, Director of Character Education, UPF International, presenting Ambassador for Peace certificate to Mr. Sudip Pathak, President of the Human Rights Organization of Nepal

At the outset, Mr. Ek Nath Dhakal gave an overview of the history of SAPI to the 120 distinguished guests. He outlined the numerous programs of UPF, which included conferences, rallies and marches as well as the World Peace Tours of the UPF Founders, Father and Mother Sun Myung Moon from Korea. The close correlation between the peace process and the SAPI programs over the past three years was especially emphasized.

Former Indian Ambassador to Nepal, Mr. K.V. Rajan, said that Nepal is doing something no other nation on earth has done. In the matter of a few years this nation is transitioning from feudalism to full-blown democracy, opening the way for a left-wing radical party to join mainstream politics, and working to create a federal government and an inclusive political structure. The Indian diplomat noted that the role of the international community was to understand, empathize with, and support this historic process, without underestimating the capacity of the people and political leaders of Nepal to resolve their own problems.


Mr. Prakash Man Singh, Vice-Chairman of the Nepali Congress Party

The president of the Human Rights Organization of Nepal, Mr. Sudip Pathak, made two novel suggestions during his 15-minute address. Most important, he said, was that "civil society must establish a code of conduct [for the nation of Nepal]." He emphasized that this cannot be done by any political party because vested interests could not be ruled out. Mr. Pathak also called for "peace volunteers" at the village level in every district of Nepal.

The importance of bringing an early resolution to the political crisis was stressed by Mr. C.P. Gajurel of the Nepal Communist Party (Maoists). "Without solving our political problems," he said, "we cannot focus on economic development." Mr. Gajurel insisted that Nepal should be immediately declared a republic and that proportional representation be part of the process.

The possibility of more violence, if the peace process fails, was raised by Mr. Krishna Gopal Shrestra, leader of Communist Nepal Party (UML).


Special Guest: Hon. G.M. Gurung, Minister of the Government of Sikkim, India Ministry of Human Resource Development and Cultural Heritage


Mr. C.P. Gajurel, Senior Leader of the Nepal Communist Party (Maoists)


He also called on the Nepalese people to look at themselves and reflect on why the peace process has been stalled. Following him, Mr. Prakash Man Singh, Vice-Chairman of the Nepali Congress Party, underscored repeatedly the need to bring this process to a conclusion in a peaceful, non-violent manner.

Special guest, Mr. G.M. Gurung, Minister of the Government of Sikkim, Ministry of Human Resource Development and Cultural Heritage, won everyone's hearts. He dressed in a Nepalese national uniform which he bought the day before after arriving in Kathmandu.

Mr. Gurung said he came not as political figure holding a government portfolio, but as a friend of UPF. Concluding his remarks he invited UPF to Sikkim and said he would help organize a similar event in Gangtok, the capital.

At the beginning of the program, UPF's philosophy of peace was shared with the 120 delegates present. Dr. Robert Kittel, Director of Peace Education for UPF-Asia, explained that people cannot be policed into being good. Instead, people have to be guided by their conscience. In order to strengthen their inner compass, people must find a common understanding of what is good. According to the UPF philosophy, a universal definition of goodness is sacrificing oneself in order that others may benefit. This becomes even more obvious by looking at the opposite—evil—which is sacrificing others for personal gain, something that is condemned universally.

If you find this page helpful and informative please consider making donation. Your donation will help Universal Peace Federation (UPF) provide new and improved reports, analysis and publications to you and everyone around the world.

UPF is a 501(c)(3) tax exempt organization and all donations are tax deductible in the United States. Receipts are automatically provided for donations of or above $250.00.

Donate to the Universal Peace Federation: Your donation to support the general programs of UPF.

Donate to the Religious Youth Service (RYS): Your donation will be used for service projects around the world.


Donate to UPF's Africa Projects: Your donation will be used for projects in Africa.




Related Articles

120 Leaders Gather at Balkan Conference

Tirana, Albania—Former heads of state and government and members of parliament attended a Balkan Leadership Conference organized by UPF.

UPF-Denmark Convenes Forum on Compassion and Empathy

Copenhagen, Denmark—The first UPF meeting of the year focused on developing a peaceful attitude that is conducive to peaceful actions.

World Interfaith Harmony Week Observed at UN in Vienna

Vienna, Austria—UPF-Austria organized a conference on the theme of “Migration and Interreligious Understanding in the Age of Globalization.”